The Ways In Which We Hurt Each Other

I’m going to stick my two cents in here concerning the almighty row which appears to have broken out in the US at Pantheocon his year, despite the undeniable facts that I am not American and have never attended this gathering.

Last year, for those of you unaware of what went on, there were a lot of very hurt Pagans left licking their wounds when a ritual billed as Dianic revealed, rather late in the day, that by “women only” the organisers of the ritual meant cis women only. That is, women born with 2 X-chromosomes in every cell, who retained the identity of women. Trans- women were informed, apparently, that this ritual was not for them when they pitched up to attend. This was an old-style Dianic affair which did not admit any but cis-gendered women.

The reprisals on both sides seemed quite hectic.

This year, a similar sort of ritual was offered, with the proviso being made, right at the end of the description that it was for “genetic women only”.

Now, leaving aside the question of whether or not a trans person who was born a woman and had chosen to identify as male would have been welcomed by this wording, this (apparent) attempt to avoid the trauma of last year’s ambiguity has seeded a backlash quite as hectic as the original furore.

Let me attempt to lay my cards on the table here: as a double-X woman encultured in this sick society, I have every reason to believe that safe space for women is sometimes in short supply and is, moreover, often needed. Places where women need not feel threatened, diminished or patronised in any way by men are not common in the male-dominated patriarchy we all live within.

Indeed, male privilege and domination is so basic to the fabric of this culture that it is often unperceived, making it hard for those with deep cultural engraining to understand just why some women would feel, well, not quite in a perfectly safe place in the presence of the dominating class. And this includes women born male physically.

As someone who is deeply aware of how the dominant paradigm often reviles or dismisses the concerns – and even the existence!-of women, non-human animals, plants and the land itself, I realise on an almost visceral level that sometimes, members of the non-dominant species (that’s most of us) have a need to gather in settings which feel non-threatening, especially perhaps for something as baring of the soul as spiritual ritual.

On the other hand, people I esteem and respect highly – among them Thorn Coyle – found it needful to sit, or stand, in silent meditation outside the site of this proposed ritual at Pantheocon the other day. And here I’m in danger of sounding as if I’m contradicting myself, for I fully empathise with those silent protestors, too.

(I would really recommend you go here to read Thorn’s deeply moving take on the affair.)

For who knows, unless they’ve been there themselves, the deep wounds a person who identifies with a gender not of the culturally-approved binary type lives with, all the time? Attacks upon people of trans-, bi-, homo- or just other-sexuality are the order of the day in probably the majority of countries on this planet today. Who can bear the pain of being told you’re not a real woman, man…whatever, because of the way you were born or the way you look or the soul you have taken the time to commune with? This is insupportable viciousness, and very common in this culture.

So were Thorn and companions right to hold silent vigil before the doors to the ritual space? Yes, they were, in my opinion.

And was Z. correct to want to provide a safe space for those not quite comfortable with the dominant gender, however configured, and to clarify that proviso? Yes, again.

Both actions were, as I feel it, correct actions.

Moreover, something which seems to have been missed in all the outrage, however justified, is this: both groups were rightly protesting the deadly presence of the over-culture, which makes insane, makes sick in the soul, and which damages the living – and indeed the no longer living – in so many, many ways.

May the Ancestors take notice, and shower blessings and healing upon all who suffered here.
Pic: Through my front door
Advertisements

8 responses to “The Ways In Which We Hurt Each Other

  1. I'm sorry but there's a basic part of this that i am missing.Why does "my" right to be included with others, overshadow the right of others to be exclusive?Like me demanding to be part of a black businessman's group. Even if i could force them to "accept" me, i would be an outsider, by definition. Especially something "spiritual", you cannot barge in and demand to be part of it? By doing that, you're destroying it as you enter. Not that i'd want to be part of a dianic ritual, but only if i were invited would it be acceptable to arrive and expect to join in, at the pleasure of those already there.Is it not so?peace and love 🙂

    Like

  2. Yup.Perhaps the background is not so clear on this one David: there were apparently some remarks from Z Budapest about trans- and other non-cisgendered women not being "real" women.It's one of the myriad ways we find to hurt each other – but, see, I empathise with both points of view here.Love,T

    Like

  3. I'm not sure what all the fuss is about here. If they want to define women by sex rather than by gender, surely they have a right to do so? If you don't like their thing, do your own, and take a "Live and let live" attitude to it.

    Like

  4. I think, Steve, that in this case it may be that the fact that Z. Budapest(the ritual originator and leader) is a widely revered and important Pagan Elder, and that she is credited with some really viscious statements wrt trans women in particular not being 'real' women.She is of course welcome to her opinion, but her visiblity and influence in the Pagan community makes this quite a big deal..err.Love,T

    Like

  5. I've been thinking and reading about this, and here's my thinking:IMHO, it's hegelian tactics at it's best, 2 extremes of a group fighting each other. Neither is correct, yet neither position is the goal. The goal is to break down "private religious ceremonies" on all levels, and remove that which is truly sacred. Agree with you completely though, very unnecessary, very dirty.It also concerns me that a very visible "elder" in any community as shown to be as vicious as this lady. Nothing good can come of her.peace and love T, and a strife free weekend 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s