I’m in a foul, unbalanced mood this morning – probably because last night my house alarm went off twice.

It’s a fault in the system, not someone trying to break in – but to say that alarm would wake the dead is an understatement.
My prana fled back down my sushumna and lay at the base of my spine in a shrivelled ball for quite some time.

Here’s a good question: “What is the difference between a priest and a shaman?”

Robert Heinlein apparently never did see the difference.

The profession of shaman has many advantages. It offers high status with a safe livelihood free of work in the dreary, sweaty sense. In most societies it offers legal privileges and immunities not granted to other men. But it is hard to see how a man who has been given a mandate from on High to spread tidings of joy to all mankind can be seriously interested in taking up a collection to pay his salary; it causes one to suspect that the shaman is on the moral level of any other con man. But it is a lovely work if you can stomach it. [Lazarus Long, Time enough for Love]

But there is one – quite a big one, too.

The priest often says s/he has had a calling to the cloth. I’m sure this is true and I’d never intimate that I thought s/he was covering up an avaricious and indolent disposition (a la Heinlein) by opting for this profession. On the contrary, it is a tough row to hoe from what I can gather.

The priest is called by the community, or conscious level of God, to serve it.
Not so the shaman, who is called by the unconscious, cthonic god-level.

The priest has the support of church and populace, not to mention his elders.
The shaman undergoes the initiatory process all alone – that’s the point.

The priest mediates between humanity and the upperlevels of spirit.
The shaman does not mediate but forms personal attachments to parts of the underworld, from where she draws her knowledge.

In general, the priests of today have little esoteric knowledge-they tend to the exoteric only.
The shaman is all about esoteria.

The number of ministers who have experienced a real, to-the-bone shamanic initiation is small, but not zero, and makes me think they’ve missed their true vocation.
But the avocation of priest may be the only avenue open to some of us in the civilised world, when what we potentially are is this other thing, a shaman.

PS It’s entirely possible, of course, that I’m making absolutely no sense at all.
If this is so, please forgive – I may be coming down with something.


7 responses to “Sushumna

  1. I’m in a foul, unbalanced mood this morning – probably because last night my house alarm went off twice.I am so glad that I don’t have such a fancy life that I have to worry about that. Most of the time I don’t even lock my door when I leave.


  2. Hecate,Yes! I never did have a close connection to the Heirophant. Or the Emperor, for that matter.Neither of them turn up very often in my own readings.Billy,In this country, almost everyome has some sort of house alarm system, no matter their economic status.But you’re right – I’d prefer not to have one at all.Love,Terri


  3. The priest is what is left after we have cut all our spiritual ties.Why is the shaman the fool (?)bbc … leaving your door or window open here is suicide. It’s not about the “stuff” … it’s about waking up in the morning.


  4. Nice post. I feel that I am a priestess. People have singled me out. Unfortunately, my hierarchy does not recognize WOMEN PRIESTS, which means I must operate in the margins. I get the High Priestess in most of my readings, as well as the Magician.(Very nice blog, and I love that Chakra graphic you used, just beautiful!)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s